Monday, October 18, 2004
John Kerry's "Honorable Discharge"? (Part II)
After yesterday's Article, we received this email:
Subject: Sealed military record?
Unlike McCain, Bush, and Gore.... Kerry has adamantly refused to authorize the release of his military records. Most think it's because of his phony battle medals.
I think the real reason is below. He was not granted an Honorable Discharge until March 2001, almost 30 years after his ostensible service term had ended! This is very much out of the ordinary, and highly suspect.
There are 5 classes of Discharge: Honorable, General, Other Than Honorable, Bad Conduct, and Dishonorable.
My guess is that he was Discharged in the '70s, but not Honorably. He appealed this sometime while Clinton was doing trouser-tricks in the Oval Office. Political pressure was applied, and the Honorable Discharge was then granted.
His file is probably rife with reports of this, submissions and hearings on the appeal, reports of his "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy, along with protests that were filed with respect to his alleged valor under fire. This will blow up in his face.
On 18 Feb. 1966 John Kerry signed a 6 year enlistment contract with the Navy (plus a 6-month extension during wartime).
Because John Kerry was discharged from Total Active Duty of only 3 years and 18 days on 3 Jan. 1970, he was then required to attend 48 drills per year, and not more than 17 days active duty for training.
Kerry was also subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Additionally, Kerry, as a commissioned officer, was prohibited from making adverse statements against his chain of command or statements against his country, especially during time of war.
The Email also listed crimes Lt. Kerry USNR committed as a Ready Reservist, while he was acting as a leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War.
Lt. Kerry by his own words and actions violated the UCMJ and the US Code while serving as a Navy officer. Lt. Kerry stands in violation of Article 3, Section 3 of the US Constitution, which defines treason as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of warfare.
A. L. "Steve" Nash, MAC Ret, UDT/SEAL SEAL AuthenticationTeam -Director AuthentiSEAL
From our Article, Sunday, October 17, 2004
John Kerry's "Honorable Discharge"?
Yesterday, John O'Neill (Swift Boat Vet) released this statement on the "Nightline" show:
One has to wonder why ABC News will not address the serious questions as to why John Kerry only received an honorable discharge through the act of then President Carter, seven years after his discharge, and had to have all of his military citations reissued, on the same day, when he became a United States Senator in 1985.
Did John Kerry received an honorable discharge through the act of then President Carter, seven years after his discharge or in Mar 12, 2001, as others has said?
Will ABC News and major media ever address this serious question?
Move over, Dan Rather, make room for Ted Koppel and ABC on the John Kerry bandwagon.
After yesterday's Article, we received this email:
Subject: Sealed military record?
Unlike McCain, Bush, and Gore.... Kerry has adamantly refused to authorize the release of his military records. Most think it's because of his phony battle medals.
I think the real reason is below. He was not granted an Honorable Discharge until March 2001, almost 30 years after his ostensible service term had ended! This is very much out of the ordinary, and highly suspect.
There are 5 classes of Discharge: Honorable, General, Other Than Honorable, Bad Conduct, and Dishonorable.
My guess is that he was Discharged in the '70s, but not Honorably. He appealed this sometime while Clinton was doing trouser-tricks in the Oval Office. Political pressure was applied, and the Honorable Discharge was then granted.
His file is probably rife with reports of this, submissions and hearings on the appeal, reports of his "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy, along with protests that were filed with respect to his alleged valor under fire. This will blow up in his face.
On 18 Feb. 1966 John Kerry signed a 6 year enlistment contract with the Navy (plus a 6-month extension during wartime).
Because John Kerry was discharged from Total Active Duty of only 3 years and 18 days on 3 Jan. 1970, he was then required to attend 48 drills per year, and not more than 17 days active duty for training.
Kerry was also subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Additionally, Kerry, as a commissioned officer, was prohibited from making adverse statements against his chain of command or statements against his country, especially during time of war.
The Email also listed crimes Lt. Kerry USNR committed as a Ready Reservist, while he was acting as a leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War.
Lt. Kerry by his own words and actions violated the UCMJ and the US Code while serving as a Navy officer. Lt. Kerry stands in violation of Article 3, Section 3 of the US Constitution, which defines treason as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of warfare.
A. L. "Steve" Nash, MAC Ret, UDT/SEAL SEAL AuthenticationTeam -Director AuthentiSEAL
From our Article, Sunday, October 17, 2004
John Kerry's "Honorable Discharge"?
Yesterday, John O'Neill (Swift Boat Vet) released this statement on the "Nightline" show:
One has to wonder why ABC News will not address the serious questions as to why John Kerry only received an honorable discharge through the act of then President Carter, seven years after his discharge, and had to have all of his military citations reissued, on the same day, when he became a United States Senator in 1985.
Did John Kerry received an honorable discharge through the act of then President Carter, seven years after his discharge or in Mar 12, 2001, as others has said?
Will ABC News and major media ever address this serious question?
Move over, Dan Rather, make room for Ted Koppel and ABC on the John Kerry bandwagon.
